The Enterprise Guide to Deepfake Fraud Prevention

The $40 Billion Threat

According to Deloitte's Center for Financial Services, deepfake-enabled fraud could reach $40 billion in losses in the United States alone by 2027. This isn't a distant future threat—it's happening now.

In 2024 alone, we've documented attacks on Arup ($25 million lost), Ferrari (narrowly avoided), WPP (attempted fraud), and LastPass (employee-thwarted). These are just the publicized incidents—many more go unreported.

Understanding the Threat Landscape

How Deepfakes Work

Modern deepfakes use Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)—AI systems where two neural networks compete:

1. Generator Network: Creates synthetic media (fake faces, voices, video)
2. Discriminator Network: Evaluates whether the output looks real
3. Iterative Improvement: The networks train against each other until fakes are nearly indistinguishable from reality

According to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, this technology has advanced rapidly and is now accessible to non-technical users.

What Attackers Need

To create a convincing deepfake, attackers typically need:

• For voice cloning: 3-10 minutes of audio (readily available from interviews, earnings calls, podcasts)
• For face swapping: Multiple photos or video footage showing different angles and expressions
• For real-time video: More significant training data, but still achievable with publicly available material

Executives and public figures are particularly vulnerable because this training data is abundant and freely accessible.

The Four Attack Vectors

1. Real-Time Video Calls

The most sophisticated attacks use real-time deepfake technology during video conferences. The Arup attack demonstrated this at scale—every participant on the call was synthetic.

Typical signs: - Slight delays in response - Unusual lighting or background artifacts - Micro-expressions that seem slightly off - Audio-video sync issues

2. Voice-Only Attacks

Lower technical barrier but highly effective. The LastPass attack used AI-cloned audio via WhatsApp calls and voicemails.

Typical signs: - Unusual communication channels - Background noise inconsistencies - Subtle voice quality variations - Unnatural pauses or breathing patterns

3. Pre-Recorded Video Messages

Attackers create convincing video messages that appear to be from executives, often used in spear-phishing campaigns.

Typical signs: - One-way communication (no real-time interaction) - Requests that can't be verified in real-time - Generic messaging despite appearing personalized

4. Hybrid Attacks

Combining multiple techniques—like the WPP attack that used a fake WhatsApp profile, voice cloning, YouTube footage, and chat impersonation simultaneously.

Building Enterprise Defenses

Layer 1: Technical Controls

#### Deepfake Detection Technology Deploy AI-powered systems that can analyze video and audio streams for signs of synthetic generation:

• Facial analysis: Detecting unnatural blinking, lip-sync issues, boundary artifacts
• Voice analysis: Identifying synthetic speech patterns, unnatural prosody
• Metadata analysis: Examining file structures for signs of AI generation

#### Hardware-Backed Identity Verification Move beyond visual trust to cryptographic proofs:

• Biometric authentication: Face ID, Windows Hello, fingerprint verification tied to known devices
• Device attestation: Verifying that communications originate from authorized devices
• Cryptographic signatures: Creating unforgeable proofs of identity

#### Network and Communication Security - Channel verification: Flag communications through unofficial channels - Domain monitoring: Watch for lookalike domains and fake websites - Email authentication: Implement DMARC, DKIM, and SPF to prevent email spoofing

Layer 2: Process Controls

#### Multi-Channel Verification For any high-stakes request: 1. Verify through a completely separate communication channel 2. Use pre-established contact information, not details provided in the request 3. Involve multiple parties in verification when possible

#### Transaction Thresholds and Approvals - Require multiple approvals for transactions above defined thresholds - Implement mandatory waiting periods for urgent requests - Create escalation paths that bypass the requesting party

#### Verification Protocols Establish pre-arranged verification methods: - Code words that change periodically - Personal questions only legitimate parties would know - Challenge-response protocols for high-risk situations

Layer 3: Human Controls

#### Security Awareness Training Regular training that specifically covers: - How deepfakes work and how they're used in attacks - Red flags to watch for in video calls and voice communications - Proper reporting procedures for suspicious contacts - Realistic simulations and exercises

#### Culture of Verification Create an environment where: - Verification is expected, not awkward - Employees feel empowered to question unusual requests - Reporting suspicious communications is rewarded - No one is "too senior" to be verified

#### Executive Protection Programs For high-risk individuals: - Limit public availability of audio and video content - Enhanced monitoring of communications - Personal verification protocols with key contacts - Regular security briefings on current threats

Incident Response Planning

Before an Attack

- Document executive communication patterns and authorized channels - Establish verification procedures with key financial partners - Create rapid response protocols for suspected deepfake incidents - Brief leadership on current threat landscape

During an Attack

1. Don't engage: Avoid providing any additional information 2. Document everything: Capture screenshots, recordings, and metadata 3. Verify independently: Contact the supposed sender through known channels 4. Alert security: Engage incident response team immediately 5. Preserve evidence: Don't delete messages or call logs

After an Attack

- Conduct thorough post-incident analysis - Share learnings across the organization - Update training materials and procedures - Brief industry peers through appropriate channels

Regulatory and Compliance Considerations

Organizations should be aware of evolving regulations:

• SEC requirements: Public companies may need to disclose material deepfake incidents
• Data protection: Deepfake attacks may constitute data breaches under GDPR and similar laws
• Industry standards: Financial services face specific requirements around authentication and fraud prevention

The National Security Agency, FBI, and CISA have jointly published guidance on contextualizing deepfake threats to organizations.

The Path Forward

Deepfake technology will only become more sophisticated and accessible. The organizations that emerge unscathed will be those that:

1. Accept the new reality: Seeing is no longer believing
2. Invest in detection: Technical solutions that can identify synthetic media
3. Build verification culture: Human processes that don't rely solely on visual/audio trust
4. Stay informed: Continuously update defenses as threats evolve

Key Takeaways for Security Leaders

• Assume targeting: If your executives are visible, they can be deepfaked
• Layer defenses: No single control is sufficient
• Train continuously: Employee awareness is your last line of defense
• Verify everything: Make verification standard practice, not an exception
• Plan for failure: Have incident response procedures ready

---

Nevrial provides enterprise-grade deepfake detection and hardware-backed identity verification. Schedule a security assessment to understand your organization's exposure to deepfake threats.